akilanajmah: (Default)
I'm sick today. I think my mild deviation from my normal routine messed me up. I'm having a hard time regulating my temperature-- I've been sweating and getting chills. Also my chest and throat hurt. Anyway, I'm going to fast as long as I can. I am super hungry, which I am usually not, today-- and all of these things, the sickness, the lethargy, the hunger, are signs that ye olde monthly visitor will be upon me. Hopefully that's the case am I'm not actually super sick.

I say all of these things though, to preface something else, it's obviously my restless illness that caused me to read a letter to the editor that said, essentially, Islam is a threat to the American way of life and that the Prophet (SAW) was a warlord that ran about after infidels.

*frown*

Yes, obviously this person had ZERO idea of what he was on about. About how everytime someone proposed a fight, the Prophet left in order to have peace and safety. That he kept moving himself and his people until there really wasn't anywhere else to go and a war was brought to him. But whatever right? You cannot educate everyone and even if Allah (SWT) came down and told this guy what was up directly, he probably would call Allah a liar and spit in His face. Some people are like that. The Revelation talks about them, so I'm unsurprised (beyond the fact that I actually read it. I try really hard not to read comments or ignorant letters to the editor).

So, today, I thought it would be a good day to actually talk about what the Revelation says about justice.

O you who believe, stand up as witnesses for God in all fairness, and do not let the hatred of a people deviate you from justice. Be just: This is the closest to piety; and beware of God. Surely God is aware of all you do. Surah Al-Ma'idah, 8.

O you who believe, be custodians of justice (and) witnesses for God, even though against yourselves or your parents or your relatives. Whether a man be rich or poor, God is his greater well wisher than you. So follow not the behests of lust lest you swerve from justice; and if you prevaricate or avoid (giving evidence), God is cognisant of all that you do. Surah An-Nisa, 135.

So yeah. There's that.

akilanajmah: (Default)
First!

I've been busy. Family drama, applying for IMPORTANT THINGS™, getting ready for Ramadan and trying to up my socialization game. I'll be starting work with the local chapter of the Council for American Islamic relations soon, inshAllah, and I've branded myself as what I be-- a member of a diverse Muslim community that hopes to show that Muslims, especially Muslimahs, are diverse and brilliant and amazing. Who do I want to show? The legislature, other governance and governing bodies. So! We'll see.

I have a few Surah Saturdays coming up. One is about Mary, mother of Jesus. There's a line in the Qu'ran where Mary's parents are sort of unhappy that they have a girl. Specifically Mary's mom, Imran's wife. God responds "No boy could ever do what she's going to do." 

"O Lord, I offer what I carry in my womb in dedication to Your service, accept it, for You hear and know everything." And when she had given birth to the child, she said: O Lord, I have delivered but a girl." --But God knew better what she had delivered... Her Lord accepted her graciously, and she grew up with excellence...


I have another coming up about the difference between messenger and Deity that was sparked by a few devotional poems to the Prophet of God. Also, got sparked by a discussion about Shia and Sunni doctrine. I don't think I've ever written about why I have a hard time with both schools and, instead, choose to follow God and his Prophets (notice that there s).

And I'm just about done with Suhaib Webb (who am I kidding, I'm done). Between his giving space to whatever person who refuses to cite sources/fills everything up with conjecture/engages in the WEST IS BAD ARAB IS GOOD wack dichotomy AND his most recent khutbah topic "The dangers of unbridled feminism."

*sideeye*

Someone asked him what that actually meant.

He responded: Unbridled feminism implies efforts to instill programs that go against agreed upon texts, a proven consensus or bring more harm to a community than good. Added to that is the constant attack on the Muslim male, which serves to undermine instead of build. I understand that we are all upset about things, but there are ways to handle them.

Do I really even need to go there?
Yes. Apparently I do.

1. I have a feeling that he's taking a shot at Amina Wadud (who is smarter than him, nicer than him and smells better) and mixed prayer. The article that he posted that I called wack dichotomy seemed to be taking a shot at her (it referenced woman led prayer). I don't even care if he's referencing her or not though-- I care that "agreed upon texts" means static, unchanging in the face of new knowledge and used in the act of denying God's abundance and mercy and grace upon all people, male or female. A proven consensus? You mean a consensus by men in a culture or society in which they have ultimate privilege? Sort of like the proven consensus amongst white folks that Black, Native and Indian folks are unable to manage themselves? Uh huh. Alright then. It'd be one thing if "agreed upon" (by some dudes) or "consensus" (amongst some more dudes) was an inclusive consensus that was full of voices from all time periods and all people... but it isn't. The only agreed upon text, imho, is the Qur'an. Everything that comes beyond it is simply an opinion on its interpretation. God tells us to get knowledge on our own by reading the Qur'an.

Al-Imran says:

It is not for a mortal to whom god reveals the Book and the judgement and the prophethood to say to the people: "Be my votaries instead of God's," but to say: "Become learned in divine law by virtue of teaching and studying the Book."

Not studying dudes ponfications on the Book, but THE BOOK. The revelations of God through messengers. Teach the Book to others and study it.

2. Oh, poor, poor, Muslim males. Being attacked from all sides. Men saying they're not modest enough, the West saying they're too modest. Old kingdoms depriving them of basic rights found nowhere in the texts sent by God (must be one of those consensus things) and infantalizing them. Being judged by their looks and sexual appeal on one side, while being judged on their vanity and sexuality on the other. Being at the bottom of the totem pole in pseudosharia societies... ah, yes. Poor Muslim males. They've got it rough. Wait... what? That's not the plight of Muslim males? Oh. Well then it must just be a bunch of dudes who're butthurt because they actually have to listen to women... I see. Got it.


3. YOU SHOULD NEVER EXPRESS YOUR ANGER (about me!)! It is damaging to the community. Of course, I can freely say whatever I wish about you... but it's a terrible burden to the umma to call me out on the things I actually do. There-- that's my Suhaib Webb to English translation.

Whatever.




akilanajmah: (Default)
So sorry I haven't been around. I still pray and thank God, but I don't always get to write.
In truth, I was conflicted about what to write last week. There's so much being said about the niqab ban and Muslims/Non-Muslims and women hating veiling and men promoting freedom to veil... that I wanted to talk about what the Qur'an actually says about modesty, who it applies to and how it has been interpreted but it seemed sort of daunting. I know where I stand but respect voices on both sides of the debate. Also, I hate that the conversation devolves into WELL THIS ISNT ISLAM on both sides. Hey, Islam is lots of things to lots of people.

And then I got to listen to a conversation about Hadith and why the Prophet asked that people not write his words down and the differences between interpretations about what "Follow your Prophet" means.

And then, Suhain Webb yesterday got into a tizzy about someone approaching women in prayer and adjusting them. He says it's inappropriate, to let people be with God in the way they are and let growth happen.

And all of that together got me into thinking about pluralism. So that's where we are today.

A couple of definitions of religious pluralism are as follows:

  • As the name of the worldview according to which one's religion is not the sole and exclusive source of truth, and thus that at least some truths and true values exist in other religions.
  • As acceptance of the concept that two or more religions with mutually exclusive truth claims are equally valid. This posture often emphasizes religion's common aspects.


I occasionally hear Muslims saying "Well, Muhammad (SAW) was the last of the prophets, so what he said was the most true."





But usually, as in the incredibly frustrating video above (the video shows Florida Pastor Terry Jones making analogies between his protest of a Michigan mosque to Martin Luther King Jr and him being completely pwned by an Imam who asks him what he actually knows of the Qur'an), there are Muslims out there saying "But the Qur'an embraces nearly all religions."

Let's take a look at the surahs shall we?

Surah Ash-Shura says: He has laid down for you the same way of life and belief which He had commended to Noah, and which We have enjoined on you, and which We have bequeathed to Abraham, Moses and Jesus, so that they should maintain the order and not be divided among themselves.

In Surah al Baqarah, God tells Muslims what to say. It says: Say: "We believe in God and what has been sent down to us, and what had been revealed to Abraham and Ishmael and Isaac and Jacob and their progeny, and that which was given to Moses and Christ, and to all other prophets by the Lord. We make no distinction among them, and we submit to Him." (emphasis added).

The exact words above are also found in Surah Al Imran (3:84) and the sentiment is repeated in An-Nisa: Those who believe not in God and His apostles, and desire to differentiate between God and His messengers, and say: We believe in some, and not others, and wish to find a way between affirmation and denial are verily the real unbelievers. But those who believe in God and His apostles and make no distinction among any of them, will be given by Him their recompense; for God is forgiving and kind. 

The Prophet was said to say that there were 124,000 prophets before him. In India, in China, in Persia, in Africa... etc.

To me, the God is revealing that He is beyond a single name or concept. She is saying "Listen, I will come to you in whatever form you need for you to understand me. You may call me any name. You may pray in many ways. All of them are valid. All of them reach Me. Jesus is as good as Noah and as good as Muhammad was as good as everyone else who looked for Me and found Me." The fact that the Creator goes out of the way to say "HEY YOU CANNOT PICK AND CHOOSE!

Surah Ar-Rum, ayah 20-22: Among His signs is that He created you from the earth and you are now human beings dispersed everywhere. Another of His signs is that He created mates of your own kind of yourselves so that you may get peace of mind from them and has put love and compassion between you. Verily, there are signs for those who reflect.  Among other signs of His is the creation of the heavens and the earth, and the variety of your tongues and complexions.


It follows, to me, that God is asking us to celebrate diversity and language and the different names that different people may call Him, the different prophets that brought Her message and the equality among all of us both as creations of God and as made of the same stuff, clay.

Seems pretty clear to me.

akilanajmah: (Default)
Surah Yusuf says:

All the apostles that We had sent before you were men of those regions to whom We sent Our revelations. Have they not traveled on the earth and seen what befell the people before them? Surely the abode of the Hereafter is better for those who fear straying from the right path. Do you not understand?

This is a reminder from God that Prophets are just guys. The surah goes on to remind people that when these men, fallible, scared and doubting, stumbled God came right in and helped them, renewing their faith.

When the apostles despaired and thought they were made false promises, Our help arrived, and we delivered whom We pleased...

Surah Ar-Ra'd says

We sent many apostles before you, and bestowed on them wives and children but it was not for any apostle to come up with a miracle unless by leave of God.

The OHAHAHA running joke amongst people who Islamaphobic is often around the fact that the Prophet refused to allow an image of himself to be preserved, the gist being, ultimately, that this is how Jesus ended up being worshiped (which, according to Islam, was not his intention at all)-- people conflated the messenger of God with God and, when he was gone, made up some quick and dirty stuff to allow them to worship him alongside God. A significant amount of qurranic verse is dedicated to those who would ascribe compeers to God or to attribute a son to Him. The gist that I get, from Islamic history, is that early Christians didn't actually worship Jesus, but it was a newer thing that was coming about around 500 years AD, just around the time the Prophet's immediate line was coming to be.

Anyway. This is about hadith and men and not forgetting that they're human, and not God.

Recently over on Allahcentric there was an article about how we fail to revere scholars today. I gave it the side eye. Despite tucking this nugget in from my favorite Canadian Shaykh, Faraz Rabbani (who I find adorable), the article seems to have missed his point entirely--

Rabbani says:the signs of Allah (subhana wa ta’ala) are to be venerated and he explained how the ‘Ulema are one of the signs of God and hence worthy of veneration. There is a difference between scholar worship and respecting scholars. No one in their right minds would imbue the ‘Ulema with the qualities of Allah (subhana wa ta’ala). Moreover, respecting the ‘Ulema does not entail overlooking injustices or unsound judgments proclaimed by them.

The essay, however, goes on to essentially talk about how we should never question scholars. Now, in context this is all about how, in the author's perception, Indians love to bash scholars and how many Indians have internalized Orientalist arguments... but the essay is still suspect because it isn't really scholar bashing that is going on... but that people are questioning hadith.

And that is where I what I'm giving the side eye to.

As you know, my two favorite go to hadith are these:


Leave aside whatever causes you doubts or misgivings, in favor of what does not cause you doubts or misgivings. For truth is peace of mind, while falsehood is mental disquiet.


Righteousness is that about which the soul feels tranquil and the heart feels tranquil, and wrongdoing is that which wavers in the soul and moves to and from in the breast even though people again and again have given you their legal opinion [in its favor].


Surah al Fajr says Oh you tranquil soul, return to your Lord well pleased and well pleasing to Him.
When I picked up the Qur'an, I instantly felt it was truth. I had no question. Some of the surahs in the Qur'an are a little questionable to me since they seem so personal (Hey, Allah here-- please leave the Prophet alone! He's too nice to ask you to give him some downtime, so don't be under his feet all the time people! Keep it moving!) but I don't feel like they're untrue.

Interpretations of the Qur'an (versus translations, but those are problematic too) I do tend to find suspect sometimes, but the words of the Qur'an? To me they hold a veracity that I had never known before (which is saying a lot since I spent more than half of my academic career studying and comparing religions).

So, whether the Prophet said those Hadith or not, I find them to be incredibly accurate.

But what about hadith that I find questionable? Read more... )
akilanajmah: (me_1)
So this week I got not one but THREE dog related things in my Facebook feed which led me to examining SURAH AL-KAHF.

First, that Suhaib Webb podcast/khutbah I posted earlier? He starts talking about people who want to live Islam in black and white, eliminating the spirit that is imbued into it. He tells a story about a blind man who was excluded from the mosque because he had a guide dog with him. Webb pauses at this point to explain that dogs aren't filthy and that it was Muslims that invented the concept back in Iraq years and years ago.

Then Amina Wadud posted this article about Muslims using guide dogs and the obstacles that they have to overcome.

Saladin Ahmed responded when I re-posted the article stating that he thought the anti-dog sentiment was from cultural stands and misinterpreted hadith. I tend to agree.
This gets a little long.  )


akilanajmah: (Default)
A Persian woman that I'm aquainted with was very upset about the news of a Bangladeshi girl who was executed for being raped. The story came in the form of an opinion piece from the NYT and it blamed the village imam for the sentence. I had a lot of problems with the story-- particularly the lack of sources, the lack of blaming the rapist, the lack of inquiry into Islam (the story went on to blame sharia instead of injustice and improper application of sharia)-- but in response to the story she was emphasizing her dislike of Mullahs, Shayks and Imams and she ended up pointing out that religion was between her and God and cited to Bani Isra'il: "You shall not accept any information, unless you verify it for yourself. I have given you the hearing, the eyesight, and the brain, and you are responsible for using them." Quran 17:36

Now, if you'll recall, I have a strict "Don't fuck with fatwas" policy myself and similarly view my relationship with God, the merciful and benevolent. I'm not a fan of treatises by Islamic scholars because I find that they tend to over look lots of things and pull too much from the past-- cultural, historical ideas that haven't moved forward, that haven't considered other perspectives-- minority perspectives, female perspectives, poor perspectives. There isn't consensus usually, and where there is, I note that several voices are significantly diminished.  I was just reading Imam Zaid Shakir's most recent essay on revolution and  what he points out the most is that things change.

In addition to pointing out the neo-colonial aspects of governing ([personal profile] delux_vivens , he talks about hegemony... be warned) the indigenous masses he points out what I've always thought:

The writings of pre-modern Muslim scholars, no matter how brilliant, cannot give us full insight into the social, political and cultural issues that Muslims are currently dealing with.


Anyway. I don't fuck with fatwas. I research things on my own, after all, God has enjoined us to seek knowledge. I was happy to see the above cited verse but I didn't remember it that way. Indeed, I even have over ayahs from Bani Isra'il highlighted but that would've stuck with me wouldn't have? I mean, considering what I already think?

My copy of the Divine Revelation says it this way: Do not follow that of which you have no knowledge. Verily, the ear, the eye, the heart, each will be questioned.

Which is sort of the same? Maybe. I went over to my handy dandy Qur'an explorer, and I still didn't see the version that Hedi had pointed out. Still, that's okay. It gave me a basis for Surah Saturday.

Again, with the specifics, God tells us very specifically to pray, and how to do so and then goes on to say:
What We have sent down of the Qur'an is a healing and grace for the faithful, and adds only loss for the sinners. When We are gracious to man, he turns away and moves aside; yet when evil befalls him, he begins to despair.

I sense such a sense of disappointment in this ayah. Man, it's like God is bummed that we're so fickle. Still, He says to us in this surah that things aren't going to always go our way. Look at the other prophets! Did their people believe them? Nope. Did they despair and give up? Huh? Did they? Nope. They trusted in Me.

I think that the demand that we not simply follow, but confirm first is the perfect solution for this type of quandry and God and his Prophet make it abundantly clear what we're meant to do: Leave aside whatever causes you doubts or misgivings, in favor of what does not cause you doubts or misgivings. For truth is peace of mind, while falsehood is mental disquiet.

Seek the truth. Acknowledge that the truth may change from person to person, from time to time. Every man's life will not be the same as every woman's life. All women's lives are different. All people's lives are different. The point is to seek God and seek truth as it reveals itself to you, to accept challenges and to turn to God in all instances-- seeking truth, seeking confirmation, seeking refuge and seeking comfort. Use what God has blessed you with to do it-- your heart, your mind, your senses.

akilanajmah: (Default)
Hadith of the week:

God has no need of abstention from food and drink on the part of one who does not abstain from speaking falsely, acting thereupon and stupid foolishness.


A person may be doing the deeds of the people of Paradise so far as society can see, while actually being on the people of Hellfire. And a person may be doing the deeds of the people of Hellfire so far as society can see, while actually being one of the people of Paradise.

Surah of the week: Al A'raf

Ask them: Who forbids you attire that God has given to His creatures, and the good things that He has provided?
Tell them: "They are meant for the believers in the world, and will be theirs on the Day of Judgment."
That is how We explain Our signs to those who know.
Tell them: "My Lord has forbidden  repugnant acts, whether open or disguised, sin and unjust oppression, associating others with God, of which He has sent down no authority, and saying things of God of which you have no knowledge."
A term is fixed for every people; and when their appointed time is come, there will neither be a moment's delay nor haste.


I have been thinking a lot about what people impute to God and, to a lesser extent, his prophet Muhammad. Part of this is interpretation and the article I posted by Hamza Yusuf is helpful in that regard-- acknowledging that even the most learned people just won't agree-- there are things that are like that-- and no matter what consensus is, you're entitled to your interpretation after doing the work to learn as much as possible.

Is it greater to simply rely on what you're told or to seek knowledge for yourself?

Seeking knowledge is incumbent upon every Muslim. Whoever goes out in search of knowledge is on the Path of God until returning.

One of the things I note in my own search for knowledge (and I've started doing these weekly posts so I can flesh my thoughts a bit) is that God is never equivocal. Everything that God says is very specific-- God says exactly what is forbidden. God says exactly what modesty should entail. God even reminds us "O Prophet, why should you forbid yourself what God has made lawful for you?" (Surah At-Tahrim)

In question was some grumbling amongst the Prophet's family about things that he was doing-- but it's still applicable. God is very clear on what needs to be done and what is forbidden. Adding more, interpreting more onto that? I think it's haram. God is the ultimate decider of things and if God did not forbid it, why should it be forbidden? I'm looking at you people who think movies/music/television are automatically haram.

Similarly, I think vague things aren't particularly reliable as attributed to the Prophet. There's a hadith that the Prophet says "Who will awaken the women in their rooms? One who dresses up in this life, may be naked in the Hereafter."

 

Wait what? What does dress up mean? And does being naked in the Hereafter mean something bad? And why is it just maybe?
Things like this have been investigated by hadith scholars and have likely been proven authentic but it just doesn't sit right with me.

For example, the prophet said, on the topic of freeing slaves "Whoever manumits his share of a jointly owned slave should free the slave completely if he has the money; otherwise, let him find gainful employment for the slave without overworking him." Pretty clear right?

For example on the topic of treating animals humanely the Prophet forbade tying down an animal, domestic or otherwise, to kill it. The Prophet cursed anyone who mutilates an animal while it is still alive. Also very clear. I just am not feeling the vagueness thing.



 





akilanajmah: (Default)
So, until I get this new Qur'an that I want, I'm going back over verses that I marked as especially important. Today's ayat come from Surah An-Nisa-- The Women.

O believers, when you go out on a journey in the way of God, be discreet and do not say to anyone who greets you in peace: "You are not a believer." You desire the gain of earthly life, but there are prizes in plenty with God. You were also like him (an unbeliever) in the past, but God has been gracious to you. So be careful and discreet, for God is aware of what you do.



These ayat came in response to one of the companions actions during wartime. He was about to kill this dude and the dude was like "WAIT! I bid you peace! I believe in no god but God!" And homey killed him anyway. He argued that the guy was just trying to spare his own life and he felt that was due the booty from killing someone in wartime. The Prophet (saw) was mortified and, ultimately, this man was too. The Prophet ultimately prayed that God would forgive this kid and God did.

But obviously these ayat aren't just applicable to killing people and people asking for mercy. It also refers to people who like to throw religion around in people's faces. People who insist on being holier than though and judging other's submission to God. Allah tells us that in matters where we differ, He will be the ultimate arbiter:

In whatever matter you disagree the ultimate judgment rests with God. This is God, my Lord; in Him I have placed my trust and to Him I turn.
Surah Ash-Shura

He also let's us know that there is an entire unseen world (both in the hadith and the Qur'an) that we don't know about-- so we probably shouldn't act like we know what's going on. We're meant, simply, to connect to God as much as possible, connect with humanity and strive toward knowledge and love. Judging others, trying to elevate yourself over your brother or sister? Not so much.

akilanajmah: (Default)
In the name of Allah, most benevolent, ever-merciful.

I call to witness the early hours of the morning  and the night when dark and still.
Your Lord has neither left you nor despises you.
What is to come is better for you than what has gone before; for your Lord will certainly give you, and you will be content.
Did He not find you an orphan and take care of you?
Did He not find you perplexed, and show you the way?
Did He not find you poor and enrich you?
So do not oppress the orphan, and do not drive the beggar away, an keep recounting the favors of your Lord.
 (Surah 93, Ad-Duha)

Have We not opened up your breast and removed your burden which had left you devoid of hope and exalted your fame? Surely, with hardship there is ease. With hardship indeed there is ease. So when you are free work diligently, and turn to your Lord with all your love.

(Surah 94, Al Inshirah)

Profile

akilanajmah: (Default)
akilanajmah

June 2013

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
2324252627 2829
30      

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 25th, 2025 03:39 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios